Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 23:56

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Roman Anthony changes to jersey number with a lot of Red Sox history - MassLive
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
June's full 'Strawberry Moon' illuminates the night sky next week: Here's how to see it - Space
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
First look: The new Pedro Pascal-narrated space show in NYC - Time Out
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What's the importance of promotion in marketing?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.